What did the Council of Constantinople II resolve regarding the Three Chapters?

The Council of Constantinople II, held in 553, addressed theological disputes that had arisen after the Council of Chalcedon in 451. A significant part of its deliberation focused on the controversy surrounding the so-called "Three Chapters," which comprised writings and individuals that were seen to undermine the decisions made at Chalcedon regarding the two natures of Christ.

The council ultimately condemned the Three Chapters as heretical. This decision was made to reaffirm the integrity of the Chalcedonian Definition, which articulated the understanding of Christ as being both fully divine and fully human. By condemning these writings, the council aimed to restore unity within the church and clarify that the teachings adhered to Chalcedon were to be maintained. This resolution was pivotal in reaffirming the church's stance against perceived Nestorian influences that arose from the interpretations of the Three Chapters.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the main resolution of the council, as the focus was strictly on the heretical nature of the Three Chapters and the reaffirmation of earlier doctrinal positions rather than changes in church leadership or liturgical practices.